Connected intelligence
AI Cases
The emerging law of artificial intelligence, through the cases shaping it.
171 cases
All Cases
Submit a caseSearch case names, docket numbers, courts and summaries. Suggestions are subject to editorial review.
171 matching cases · 171 loaded records · Showing 81–100
- Google LLC v. SerpApi, LLC
N.D. Cal. · 4:25-cv-10826
Google LLC has commenced proceedings against SerpApi, LLC in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The complaint asserts that SerpApi operates a commercial "scraping" service that…
IP & CopyrightFiled19 Dec 2025AI systemNot recordedStatusActive - The New York Times Company v. Perplexity AI, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1:25-cv-10106
The New York Times Company v. Perplexity AI, Inc. commenced in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The claimant alleges systematic copyright infringement through AI-powered content copying and distribution.
IP & CopyrightFiled5 Dec 2025AI systemPerplexityBotStatusActive - Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation
N.D. Cal. · 5:25-cv-10287
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation is a class action commenced in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The Plaintiffs, several YouTube content creators, allege Nvidia unlawfully circumvented YouTube's technological measures to scrape their…
IP & CopyrightFiled26 Nov 2025AI systemCosmosStatusActive - U.S. News & World Report, L.P. v. OpenAI, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1:25-cv-09912
Consolidated proceeding: In re OpenAI Inc. Copyright Infringement Litigation (MDL 3143)
Filed26 Nov 2025AI systemNot recordedStatusConsolidated - Labelbox, Inc. v. Gujarati
N.D. Cal. · 3:25-cv-10159
Filed24 Nov 2025AI systemNot recordedStatusActive - Khan v. Figma, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 3:25-cv-10054
On 21 November 2025, Raza Khan filed a proposed class action against Figma, Inc., alleging that the company unlawfully used customers’ intellectual property to train its generative AI models in connection with the rollout of new AI-enabled products and its initial public…
IP & CopyrightFiled21 Nov 2025AI systemFigmaStatusActive - City of New York v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 4:25-cv-09925
The City of New York ("NYC") filed this lawsuit against Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook, Google, YouTube, TikTok, Snap and others, alleging that the company’s design and operation of its social media platforms contributed to a youth mental health crisis. The Complaint asserts…
Autonomy & Human AgencyFiled18 Nov 2025AI systemVariousStatusActive - Thele v. Google LLC
N.D. Cal. · 5:25-cv-09704
Thele v. Google LLC commenced in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The claimant alleges Google secretly activated AI tracking of private communications without user consent.
Privacy & SurveillanceFiled11 Nov 2025AI systemGeminiStatusActive - Allan Brooks v. OpenAI, Inc., et al
Cal. Super. Ct. Los Angeles · 25STCV32386
The Plaintiff, Allan Brooks, brings a product liability action against OpenAI, Inc., related corporate entities and CEO Sam Altman. He alleges that ChatGPT-4o's design, operation and safety practices caused him to experience a mental health crisis resulting in financial,…
Autonomy & Human AgencyFiled6 Nov 2025AI systemChatGPTStatusActive - Cedric Lacey, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent, Amaurie Lacey v. OpenAI, Inc., et al.
Cal. Super. Ct. San Francisco · CGC-25-6308 08
The Plaintiff, Cedric Lacey, brings a wrongful death and product liability action against OpenAI, Inc. and related corporate entities as successor-in-interest to his 17-year-old son, Amaurie Lacey, who died by suicide on 2 June 2025. According to The Complaint, ChatGPT-4o…
Safety & Physical HarmFiled6 Nov 2025AI systemChatGPTStatusActive - Christopher "Kirk" Shamblin, et al. v. OpenAI, Inc., et al.
Cal. Super. Ct. Los Angeles · 25STCV32382
The Plaintiffs, the parents of 23-year-old Zane Shamblin, bring a wrongful death and product liability action against OpenAI, Inc., related corporate entities and CEO Sam Altman. They allege that ChatGPT-4o’s design, operation and safety practices caused or materially…
Safety & Physical HarmFiled6 Nov 2025AI systemChatGPTStatusActive - Entrepreneur Media, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 3:25-cv-09579
Entrepreneur Media, LLC has commenced proceedings against Meta Platforms, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The complaint asserts that Meta…
IP & CopyrightFiled6 Nov 2025AI systemLLaMaStatusActive - Hannah Madden v. OpenAI, Inc., et al
Cal. Super. Ct. Los Angeles · 25STCV32383
The Plaintiff, 32-year-old Hannah Madden of North Carolina, brings a product liability, negligence and unfair competition claim against OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI OpCo, LLC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC and CEO Sam Altman. The Plaintiff alleges that ChatGPT-4o’s design, behaviour and…
Safety & Physical HarmFiled6 Nov 2025AI systemChatGPTStatusActive - Jacob Lee Irwin v. OpenAI, Inc., et al.
Cal. Super. Ct. San Francisco · CGC-25-6308 11
The Plaintiff, Jacob Lee Irwin, a 30-year-old cybersecurity professional, filed a product liability, negligence, and statutory action against the Defendants, OpenAI, Inc., related corporate entities and CEO Sam Altman. The Plaintiff alleges that the defective and dangerous…
Safety & Physical HarmFiled6 Nov 2025AI systemChatGPTStatusActive - James v. Together Computer, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 3:25-cv-09578
Darius H. James, an author and performance artist, filed a class action copyright infringement lawsuit against Together Computer, Inc. (Together AI) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. James alleges that Together AI downloaded, copied, and…
IP & CopyrightFiled6 Nov 2025AI systemNot recordedStatusActive - Jennifer "Kate" Fox, et al. vs OpenAI, Inc., et al.
Cal. Super. Ct. Los Angeles · 25STCV32379
The Plaintiff, Jennifer "Kate" Fox, individually and as successor-in-interest to the deceased, Joseph "Joe" Martin Ceccanti, filed a wrongful death and product liability action against the Defendants, OpenAI, Inc., related corporate entities and CEO Sam Altman. The Plaintiff…
Safety & Physical HarmFiled6 Nov 2025AI systemChatGPTStatusActive - Karen Enneking, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent, Joshua Enneking v. OpenAI, Inc., et al
Cal. Super. Ct. San Francisco · CGC-25-6308 09
The Plaintiff, Karen Enneking, brings a wrongful death and product liability action against OpenAI, Inc. and related corporate entities as successor-in-interest to her 26-year-old son, Joshua Enneking, who died by suicide on 4 August 2025. According to The Complaint, ChatGPT-4o…
Safety & Physical HarmFiled6 Nov 2025AI systemChatGPTStatusActive - Amazon.com Services LLC v. Perplexity AI, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 3:25-cv-09514
On 11 November 2025, Amazon.com Services LLC commenced proceedings against Perplexity AI, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging violations of federal and California computer fraud statutes. The complaint asserts that…
Privacy & SurveillanceFiled4 Nov 2025AI systemComet (Perplexity)StatusActive - James v. Cerebras Systems Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 3:25-cv-09361
SUMMARY Darius H. James, an author and performance artist, filed a class action copyright infringement lawsuit against Cerebras Systems Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. James alleges that Cerebras downloaded and copied pirated books…
IP & CopyrightFiled30 Oct 2025AI systemCerebras-GPTStatusActive - Alexander v. Apple Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 4:25-cv-09090
On 22 October 2025, author Tasha Alexander filed a class action complaint alleging that Apple unlawfully used her copyrighted literary works (and the works of others) to train its OpenELM and FLM models powering Apple Intelligence. The complaint claims Apple copied pirated…
IP & CopyrightConsolidated proceeding: Hendrix v. Apple Inc
Filed22 Oct 2025AI systemApple IntelligenceStatusConsolidated
Coverage and Sources
The tracker centres on US litigation, using CourtListener (Free Law Project) and other public records. Information is provided for educational and research purposes.
We track disputes concerning AI systems, alleged harms and emerging legal issues. Case records may connect to organisations, models and systems, concepts and legislation; only reviewed and approved connections are displayed.
Deep Lex is independent of its source providers. Information is provided for research. References to parties or cases do not imply endorsement, affiliation or a legal conclusion.
Visit CourtListener