Connected intelligence
AI Cases
The emerging law of artificial intelligence, through the cases shaping it.
171 cases
Explore the case record
Visualise
Explore how categories of alleged harm connect to AI organisations through reviewed case records. Select a connection to read the cases behind it.
Based on 171 loaded selected case records. Counts represent distinct cases with published, approved links; they do not measure liability or the full extent of litigation.
Select a category, AI organisation or connecting ribbon.
No links in this viewPrivacy & Surveillance5 cases
No links in this viewAutonomy & Human Agency4 cases
No links in this viewGovernment & Regulatory3 cases
No links in this viewEnvironmental & Community1 case
No links in this view
All 8 recorded harm categories are shown. Organisations appear six at a time. Counts beside connected categories include all matching organisation links, across pages. Ribbon width counts case–organisation links, so a case can appear in multiple flows.
Coverage and Sources
The tracker centres on US litigation, using CourtListener (Free Law Project) and other public records. Coverage is selective and updated as records are reviewed. Allegations and harm classifications are not findings of liability.
We track disputes concerning AI systems, alleged harms and emerging legal issues. Case records may connect to organisations, models and systems, concepts and legislation; only reviewed and approved connections are displayed.
Deep Lex is independent of its source providers. Information is provided for research. References to parties or cases do not imply endorsement, affiliation or a legal conclusion.
Visit CourtListener