Connected intelligence
AI Cases
The emerging law of artificial intelligence, through the cases shaping it.
171 cases
All Cases
Submit a caseSearch case names, docket numbers, courts and summaries. Suggestions are subject to editorial review.
171 matching cases · 171 loaded records · Showing 61–80
- Filed4 Mar 2026AI systemGeminiStatusActive
- Nippon Life Insurance Company of America v. OpenAI Foundation
N.D. Ill. · 1:26-cv-02448
On 4 March 2026, Nippon Life Insurance Company of America filed a complaint in the Northern District of Illinois against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC, in what is believed to be one of the first lawsuits to accuse a major AI developer of the unlicensed practice of law…
Misinformation & ManipulationFiled4 Mar 2026AI systemChatGPTStatusActive - Greene v. Google LLC
N.D. Cal. · 3:26-cv-01773
Detailed summary coming soon.
Misinformation & ManipulationFiled2 Mar 2026AI systemNotebookLMStatusActive - Businessing LLC v. Runway AI, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1:26-cv-01655
Detailed summary coming soon.
IP & CopyrightFiled27 Feb 2026AI systemRunwayStatusActive - David Vance Gardner v. Runway AI, Inc.
C.D. Cal. · 2:26-cv-01941
Detailed summary coming soon.
IP & CopyrightFiled23 Feb 2026AI systemRunwayStatusActive - Filed18 Feb 2026AI systemRunwayStatusActive
- Nicole Chmura v. Snap Inc
C.D. Cal. · 2:26-cv-01732
On 18 February 2026, Nicole Chmura filed a nationwide class action complaint against Snap Inc. in the Central District of California, alleging violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's anti-circumvention provisions under 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a). The Complaint alleges…
IP & CopyrightFiled18 Feb 2026AI systemSnapStatusActive - Kleiner v. Adobe Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 5:26-cv-01218
Kleiner v. Adobe Inc. is a class action commenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Plaintiff, a published author, alleges that Adobe Inc. unlawfully used copyrighted books to train its SlimLM artificial intelligence models without…
IP & CopyrightConsolidated proceeding: Lyon v. Adobe Inc.
Filed9 Feb 2026AI systemSlimLMStatusConsolidated - Youngblood v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 3:26-cv-01100
On 4 February 2026, content creators Devin Youngblood, Nicole Chmura, and Chris Rice filed a class action complaint against Meta Platforms, Inc. in the Northern District of California alleging violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's anti-circumvention provisions.…
IP & CopyrightFiled4 Feb 2026AI systemV-JEPAStatusDismissed - Youngblood v. Nvidia Corporation
N.D. Cal. · 5:26-cv-00916
On 29 January 2026, Devin Youngblood filed a nationwide class action complaint against Nvidia Corporation in the Northern District of California, alleging violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's anti-circumvention provisions, 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a). The Complaint…
IP & CopyrightFiled29 Jan 2026AI systemCosmosStatusDismissed - Concord Music Group, Inc. v. Anthropic PBC
N.D. Cal. · 5:26-cv-00880
Known as "Concord II". Detailed summary coming soon.
IP & CopyrightFiled28 Jan 2026AI systemClaudeStatusActive - DOE v. X.AI Corp.
N.D. Cal. · 5:26-cv-00772
On 16 March 2026, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 (a minor), and Jane Doe 3 (a minor) filed a class action complaint against X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Complaint alleges that Defendants' artificial…
Autonomy & Human AgencyFiled23 Jan 2026AI systemGrokStatusActive - Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Snap Inc.
C.D. Cal. · 2:26-cv-00754
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Snap Inc. is a class action commenced in the US District Court for the Central District of California. The Plaintiffs, several YouTubers, allege Snap unlawfully circumvented YouTube's technological measures to scrape their copyrighted videos for the…
IP & CopyrightFiled23 Jan 2026AI systemSnapStatusActive - St. Clair v. X.AI Holdings Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1:26-cv-00386
On 15 January 2026, Ashley St. Clair filed a Complaint in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York against X.AI Holdings Corp. The Plaintiff seeks damages and injunctive relief alleging that Grok, X.AI's generative AI tool, enabled users to create and…
Misinformation & ManipulationFiled15 Jan 2026AI systemGrokStatusActive - Atlantic Recording Corporation v. Anna's Archive
S.D.N.Y. · 1:26-cv-00002
Detailed summary coming soon.
IP & CopyrightFiled2 Jan 2026AI system-StatusConcluded - Anders v. Stability AI US Services Corporation
W.D.N.C. · 1:25-cv-00451
On 29 December 2025, Jerry Anders, a professional musician operating as Anders Manga, filed a copyright infringement action against Stability AI, Inc. and Navarr Enterprises (d/b/a AudioSparx) in the Western District of North Carolina. Anders alleges that Defendants copied his…
IP & CopyrightFiled29 Dec 2025AI systemStable AudioStatusDismissed - X.AI LLC v. Rob Bonta
C.D. Cal. · 2:25-cv-12295
On 29 December 2025, X.AI filed a claim in the US District Court for the Central District of California against Rob Banta, the Attorney General of the State of California. The Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief challenging California Assembly Bill 2013 ("AB…
Government & RegulatoryFiled29 Dec 2025AI systemGrokStatusOn appeal - Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. ByteDance Inc
N.D. Cal. · 3:25-cv-10933
Detailed summary coming soon.
IP & CopyrightFiled23 Dec 2025AI systemNot recordedStatusActive - Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 4:25-cv-10931
Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. commenced in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The Plaintiffs allege Meta unlawfully scraped millions of YouTube videos to train its Make-A-Video AI system.
IP & CopyrightFiled23 Dec 2025AI systemMake-A-VideoStatusActive - Filed22 Dec 2025AI systemClaudeStatusActive
Coverage and Sources
The tracker centres on US litigation, using CourtListener (Free Law Project) and other public records. Information is provided for educational and research purposes.
We track disputes concerning AI systems, alleged harms and emerging legal issues. Case records may connect to organisations, models and systems, concepts and legislation; only reviewed and approved connections are displayed.
Deep Lex is independent of its source providers. Information is provided for research. References to parties or cases do not imply endorsement, affiliation or a legal conclusion.
Visit CourtListener