Independent · Nonprofit · Open access
Deep Lex

Individual case record

Nicole Chmura v. Snap Inc

IP & CopyrightStatus: Active

Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

View on CourtListener ↗
Court
C.D. Cal.
Docket
2:26-cv-01732
Filed
18 Feb 2026
AI system
Snap

Individual case record

Overview

On 18 February 2026, Nicole Chmura filed a nationwide class action complaint against Snap Inc. in the Central District of California, alleging violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's anti-circumvention provisions under 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a). The Complaint alleges that Snap acquired YouTube-hosted audiovisual works without authorisation through scraping and bulk downloading methods, bypassing YouTube's technological protective measures, to train its artificial intelligence systems without obtaining licences from content creators. The Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, statutory damages, and other remedies authorised under 17 U.S.C. § 1203.

Facts & Claims

The Complaint alleges that Nicole Chmura operates the YouTube channel "Let's Go Team," featuring independently produced travel videos documenting her personal experiences. The Complaint contends that YouTube employs technological protective measures to control access to underlying audiovisual files and prevent bulk extraction by automated systems, providing access primarily through controlled streaming pathways and authorised features for users with YouTube Premium licences.

The Complaint refers to YouTube's Terms of Service which expressly prohibit scraping, unauthorised downloading, bulk extraction, and data mining of audiovisual content except through permitted product features or licensed APIs. The Complaint notes that YouTube has publicly stated that AI companies scraping videos for training models would constitute a "clear violation" of its terms of service.

The Plaintiff contends that Snap did not obtain licences or permissions from the Plaintiff and class members for file-level acquisition and use of their works as AI training inputs. Instead, the Complaint alleges that Snap used or relied upon circumvention tools and services to defeat YouTube's technological measures at scale. It is alleged that at least one video from the Plaintiff's channel appears in the "HD-VILA-100M" dataset, which the Defendant used to train its AI video-learning architecture.

The Complaint asserts that the Plaintiff and class members derive value from their works through viewership, advertising, sponsorships, licensing, and other monetisation dependent upon controlled distribution and the ability to choose whether, when, and how their works are licensed for downstream uses, including AI model training.

The sole cause of action alleges violations of the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions under 17 U.S.C. § 1201(a), which prohibit circumventing technological measures that effectively control access to copyrighted works and trafficking in circumvention technologies and services. The Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, statutory damages, and other remedies authorised by 17 U.S.C. § 1203.

This summary is provided for educational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Allegations described are those made in the filings. Please consult the underlying source documents.

Source documents

Documents

Read the complaint and available amendments. For the latest filings, view the source docket ↗.

Loading document records…

Connections

Related content

No approved public connections are available for this dispute yet.

Procedural record

Court & docket history

Docket entries from the past three months. For the complete history and latest filings, follow the source docket.

View full docket on CourtListener ↗

Loading docket entries…

Latest filing recorded: 9 Jun 2026.