Independent · Nonprofit · Open access
Deep Lex

Connected intelligence

AI Cases

The emerging law of artificial intelligence, through the cases shaping it.

171 cases

Explore the case record

By Issue

Explore cases by the category of harm alleged. Choose an issue to read its most recent cases.

Selected issue

Safety & Physical Harm

16cases

Classifications describe alleged harms, not findings of liability. Open a case for its summary, status and sources.

Recent cases

  1. His Majesty the King in Right of the Province of British Columbia v. Altman

    N.D. Cal. · 3:26-cv-10743

    Filed
    21 Sept 2026
    AI system
    ChatGPT
    Status
    Active

    On 21 September 2026, British Columbia and a school board filed a claim before the District Court of the Northern District of California (San Francisco division) against OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman. The Complaint alleges that OpenAI and Sam Altman failed to notify…

  2. Doe 1 v. X.AI Corp.

    N.D. Cal. · 5:26-cv-02246

    Filed
    16 Mar 2026
    AI system
    Grok
    Status
    Active

    On 16 March 2026, Jane Does 1, 2 (a minor), and 3 (also a minor) filed a class action complaint against X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Complaint alleges that Defendants' artificial intelligence model…

  3. Gavalas v. Google LLC

    N.D. Cal. · 5:26-cv-01849

    Filed
    4 Mar 2026
    AI system
    Gemini
    Status
    Active

    Detailed summary coming soon.

Counts reflect recorded harm categories in the selected case collection. Based on 171 loaded case records.

Coverage and Sources

The tracker centres on US litigation, using CourtListener (Free Law Project) and other public records. Information is provided for educational and research purposes.

We track disputes concerning AI systems, alleged harms and emerging legal issues. Case records may connect to organisations, models and systems, concepts and legislation; only reviewed and approved connections are displayed.

Deep Lex is independent of its source providers. Information is provided for research. References to parties or cases do not imply endorsement, affiliation or a legal conclusion.

Visit CourtListener