Independent · Nonprofit · Open access
Deep Lex

Connected intelligence

AI Cases

The emerging law of artificial intelligence, through the cases shaping it.

171 cases

Explore the case record

By Issue

Explore cases by the category of harm alleged. Choose an issue to read its most recent cases.

Selected issue

Privacy & Surveillance

5cases

Classifications describe alleged harms, not findings of liability. Open a case for its summary, status and sources.

Recent cases

  1. Vredenburgh v. OpenAI OpCo, LLC

    N.D. Cal. · 3:26-cv-10527

    Filed
    16 Sept 2026
    AI system
    ChatGPT
    Status
    Active

    The Plaintiffs, ChatGPT users, filed a class action before the District Court of the Northern District of California on 16 September 2026. The Complaint alleges that OpenAI’s “Project Lily” gave outside contractors access to private conversations for human review and model…

  2. Angwin v. Superhuman Platform, Inc.

    S.D.N.Y. · 1:26-cv-02005

    Filed
    11 Mar 2026
    AI system
    Not recorded
    Status
    Active

    Detailed summary coming soon.

  3. Thele v. Google LLC

    N.D. Cal. · 5:25-cv-09704

    Filed
    11 Nov 2025
    AI system
    Gemini
    Status
    Active

    Thele v. Google LLC commenced in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The claimant alleges Google secretly activated AI tracking of private communications without user consent.

Counts reflect recorded harm categories in the selected case collection. Based on 171 loaded case records.

Coverage and Sources

The tracker centres on US litigation, using CourtListener (Free Law Project) and other public records. Coverage is selective and updated as records are reviewed. Allegations and harm classifications are not findings of liability.

We track disputes concerning AI systems, alleged harms and emerging legal issues. Case records may connect to organisations, models and systems, concepts and legislation; only reviewed and approved connections are displayed.

Deep Lex is independent of its source providers. Information is provided for research. References to parties or cases do not imply endorsement, affiliation or a legal conclusion.

Visit CourtListener