Independent · Nonprofit · Open access
Deep Lex

Connected intelligence

AI Cases

The emerging law of artificial intelligence, through the cases shaping it.

171 cases

Explore the case record

By Issue

Explore cases by the category of harm alleged. Choose an issue to read its most recent cases.

Selected issue

Misinformation & Manipulation

5cases

Classifications describe alleged harms, not findings of liability. Open a case for its summary, status and sources.

Recent cases

  1. Nippon Life Insurance Company of America v. OpenAI Foundation

    N.D. Ill. · 1:26-cv-02448

    Filed
    4 Mar 2026
    AI system
    ChatGPT
    Status
    Active

    On 4 March 2026, Nippon Life Insurance Company of America filed a complaint in the Northern District of Illinois against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC, in what is believed to be one of the first lawsuits to accuse a major AI developer of the unlicensed practice of law…

  2. Greene v. Google LLC

    N.D. Cal. · 3:26-cv-01773

    Filed
    2 Mar 2026
    AI system
    NotebookLM
    Status
    Active

    Detailed summary coming soon.

  3. St. Clair v. X.AI Holdings Corp.

    S.D.N.Y. · 1:26-cv-00386

    Filed
    15 Jan 2026
    AI system
    Grok
    Status
    Active

    On 15 January 2026, Ashley St. Clair filed a Complaint in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York against X.AI Holdings Corp. The Plaintiff seeks damages and injunctive relief alleging that Grok, X.AI's generative AI tool, enabled users to create and…

Counts reflect recorded harm categories in the selected case collection. Based on 171 loaded case records.

Coverage and Sources

The tracker centres on US litigation, using CourtListener (Free Law Project) and other public records. Coverage is selective and updated as records are reviewed. Allegations and harm classifications are not findings of liability.

We track disputes concerning AI systems, alleged harms and emerging legal issues. Case records may connect to organisations, models and systems, concepts and legislation; only reviewed and approved connections are displayed.

Deep Lex is independent of its source providers. Information is provided for research. References to parties or cases do not imply endorsement, affiliation or a legal conclusion.

Visit CourtListener