Independent · Nonprofit · Open access
Deep Lex

Connected intelligence

AI Cases

The emerging law of artificial intelligence, through the cases shaping it.

171 cases

Explore the case record

By Issue

Explore cases by the category of harm alleged. Choose an issue to read its most recent cases.

Selected issue

Government & Regulatory

3cases

Classifications describe alleged harms, not findings of liability. Open a case for its summary, status and sources.

Recent cases

  1. X.AI LLC v. Ellison

    D. Minnesota · 0:26-cv-03425

    Filed
    27 Jul 2026
    AI system
    Grok
    Status
    Active

    On 27 July 2026, X.AI LLC filed a Complaint in the US District Court for the District of Minnesota against Keith Ellison, Attorney General of Minnesota. The Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief challenging House File 1606 ("HF 1606"), a Minnesota statute that…

  2. Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War

    N.D. Cal. · 3:26-cv-01996

    Filed
    9 Mar 2026
    AI system
    Claude
    Status
    Concluded

    On 9 March 2026, Anthropic filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against seventeen federal agencies and their heads in the Northern District of California. The Complaint alleges that the Executive Branch unlawfully retaliated against Anthropic after it refused…

  3. X.AI LLC v. Rob Bonta

    C.D. Cal. · 2:25-cv-12295

    Filed
    29 Dec 2025
    AI system
    Grok
    Status
    On appeal

    On 29 December 2025, X.AI filed a claim in the US District Court for the Central District of California against Rob Banta, the Attorney General of the State of California. The Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief challenging California Assembly Bill 2013 ("AB…

Counts reflect recorded harm categories in the selected case collection. Based on 171 loaded case records.

Coverage and Sources

The tracker centres on US litigation, using CourtListener (Free Law Project) and other public records. Coverage is selective and updated as records are reviewed. Allegations and harm classifications are not findings of liability.

We track disputes concerning AI systems, alleged harms and emerging legal issues. Case records may connect to organisations, models and systems, concepts and legislation; only reviewed and approved connections are displayed.

Deep Lex is independent of its source providers. Information is provided for research. References to parties or cases do not imply endorsement, affiliation or a legal conclusion.

Visit CourtListener