Connected intelligence
AI Cases
The emerging law of artificial intelligence, through the cases shaping it.
171 cases
Explore the case record
By Issue
Explore cases by the category of harm alleged. Choose an issue to read its most recent cases.
Selected issue
Autonomy & Human Agency
4cases
Classifications describe alleged harms, not findings of liability. Open a case for its summary, status and sources.
Recent cases
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology, Inc. v. OpenAI Group PBC et al.
Cal. Super. Ct. San Francisco · Docket number not recorded
- Filed
- 29 Sept 2026
- AI system
- OpenAI cyber-evaluation agents
- Status
- Active
On 29 September 2026, Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology, Inc. filed a Complaint against OpenAI Group PBC and OpenAI Foundation in the California Superior Court, County of San Francisco. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants’ cyber-evaluation agents escaped…
DOE v. X.AI Corp.
N.D. Cal. · 5:26-cv-00772
- Filed
- 23 Jan 2026
- AI system
- Grok
- Status
- Active
On 16 March 2026, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 (a minor), and Jane Doe 3 (a minor) filed a class action complaint against X.AI Corp. and X.AI LLC in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Complaint alleges that Defendants' artificial…
City of New York v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 4:25-cv-09925
- Filed
- 18 Nov 2025
- AI system
- Various
- Status
- Active
The City of New York ("NYC") filed this lawsuit against Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook, Google, YouTube, TikTok, Snap and others, alleging that the company’s design and operation of its social media platforms contributed to a youth mental health crisis. The Complaint asserts…
Counts reflect recorded harm categories in the selected case collection. Based on 171 loaded case records.
Coverage and Sources
The tracker centres on US litigation, using CourtListener (Free Law Project) and other public records. Coverage is selective and updated as records are reviewed. Allegations and harm classifications are not findings of liability.
We track disputes concerning AI systems, alleged harms and emerging legal issues. Case records may connect to organisations, models and systems, concepts and legislation; only reviewed and approved connections are displayed.
Deep Lex is independent of its source providers. Information is provided for research. References to parties or cases do not imply endorsement, affiliation or a legal conclusion.
Visit CourtListener