Apple Intelligence
Source evidence available
Individual case record
Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement
Part of a consolidated proceeding
This page covers the individual action. For coordinated filings and updates, consult the lead court docket. The consolidated overview links the related actions.
Go to consolidated proceedingIndividual case record
Martinez-Conde v. Apple Inc. is a class action commenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Plaintiffs, two neuroscientist authors, allege that Apple Inc. unlawfully reproduced copyrighted books without authorisation to train its Apple Intelligence AI models, including its OpenELM and Foundation Language Models.
On 9 October 2025, Susana Martinez-Conde and Stephen L. Macknik commenced class action proceedings against Apple Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging direct copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 501. The Complaint asserts that Apple reproduced copyrighted works without authorisation by utilising the Books3 dataset (a notorious shadow library derived from the Bibliotik private tracker containing approximately 196,640 books) as training data for its OpenELM language models and Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models. According to the pleadings, Apple's own model card on Hugging Face and its OpenELM research paper confirm that training data included the Books3 component of The Pile dataset and a subset of RedPajama-V1, both of which incorporate Books3. The Complaint further alleges that Apple deployed its web-crawler, Applebot, to scrape shadow libraries and other publicly available internet content for nearly nine years before disclosing its intent to use that data for AI training, by which time the Foundation Language Models had already been trained. The Plaintiffs' work, "Sleights of Mind", is confirmed to appear in Books3; Champions of Illusion is alleged to appear in the Library Genesis shadow library.
The Complaint emphasises that Apple struck licensing agreements with Shutterstock and approached news organisations including Condé Nast and NBC News, yet made no effort to compensate authors whose works it copied. A single cause of action is advanced: direct copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 501.
The Plaintiffs seek class certification, statutory and compensatory damages, a permanent injunction, destruction of all infringing Apple Intelligence models and training sets incorporating class members' works, and attorneys' fees and costs.
This summary is provided for educational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Allegations described are those made in the filings. Please consult the underlying source documents.
Source documents
Read the complaint and available amendments. For coordinated filings, consult the lead court docket. View consolidated proceeding →
Loading document records…
Related content
Source evidence available
Procedural record
Docket entries from the past three months. For the complete history and latest filings, follow the source docket. Coordinated proceedings have a separate lead docket.
View full docket on CourtListener ↗Loading docket entries…
Latest filing recorded: 4 Feb 2026.