ChatGPT
Source evidence available
Individual case record
Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement
Individual case record
On 10 March 2026, Gracenote Media Services, LLC filed a copyright infringement action against OpenAI Foundation and seven related corporate entities in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Complaint alleges that the Defendants copied and used Gracenote's proprietary media content metadata database without authorisation to train the GPT series of large language models, and that those models now reproduce Gracenote's original content verbatim. The Plaintiff seeks statutory and compensatory damages, disgorgement of profits, a permanent injunction, and an order requiring the destruction of all GPT models and training sets incorporating Gracenote Data.
On 10 March 2026, Gracenote Media Services, LLC, a Delaware-based provider of media content metadata, filed suit against OpenAI and its affiliated entities. Gracenote decsribes how for over fifty years it has employed hundreds of editors to build and maintain the Gracenote Programs Database, a proprietary relational database containing millions of original program descriptions, video descriptors, and unique alphanumeric identifiers (TMSIDs) covering television, film, and other media content. The database is licensed to distributors, streaming platforms, and AI developers under agreements that impose strict restrictions on downstream use. Gracenote holds registered copyrights in the database with the United States Copyright Office.
The Complaint alleges that the Defendants copied Gracenote Data without authorisation during the training of successive GPT models from GPT-3 through GPT-5, including by scraping Gracenote's web domains via the Common Crawl dataset in breach of Gracenote's Terms of Use. The Complaint advances forensic evidence of copying: GPT-4 model variants correctly reproduced exact TMSIDs for multiple television programmes, including Breaking Bad and Game of Thrones, with the probability of randomly generating a correct 12-character TMSID estimated at one in one trillion. It is further alleged that multiple GPT models reproduced verbatim, or near-verbatim, program descriptions and proprietary mood descriptor sets for dozens of titles.
The Complaint contends that the Defendants' conduct has harmed Gracenote in two markets: the market for licensed media metadata used in content discovery, and the growing market for curated data licensed for AI training and grounding. Four causes of action are asserted: direct copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. section 501; vicarious copyright infringement against the controlling entities; contributory copyright infringement; and unjust enrichment under common law.
The Plaintiff seeks statutory and compensatory damages, restitution, disgorgement of profits, a permanent injunction, destruction of infringing models and training sets under 17 U.S.C. section 503(b), and an award of costs and attorneys' fees.
This summary is provided for educational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Allegations described are those made in the filings. Please consult the underlying source documents.
Source documents
Read the complaint and available amendments. For the latest filings, view the source docket ↗.
Loading document records…
Related content
Source evidence available
OpenAI Foundation is recorded as defendant; OpenAI Group PBC is recorded as defendant; OpenAI GP, LLC is recorded as defendant; OpenAI OpCo, LLC is recorded as defendant; OpenAI Global, LLC is recorded as defendant; OAI Corporation, LLC is recorded as defendant; OpenAI Holdings, LLC is recorded as defendant; OpenAI, LLC is recorded as all defendants; OpenAI, LLC is recorded as defendant.
Procedural record
Docket entries from the past three months. For the complete history and latest filings, follow the source docket.
View full docket on CourtListener ↗Loading docket entries…
Latest filing recorded: 14 Oct 2026.