Deep Lex
Back to Regulation Tracker

Chile AI Regulation

In progress

Overview

An AI Systems Regulation Bill was introduced in committee in 2024 and remains under legislative review. No AI law has been enacted.
  • Chile has established CENIA (National AI Centre) as its national research body and leads the LatAm AI Index.

Key Sources

Ministry of Science — AI ProgrammeView
CENIA (National AI Centre)View

This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

AI Regulation Timeline

  1. 13/10/2025
    passage

    Chamber of Deputies passed Bill regulating Artificial Intelligence systems, including design requirements

    On 13 October 2025, the Chamber of Deputies passed the Bill regulating Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, including design requirements. The Bill requires AI systems to be designed to allow for human control and monitoring, and must be technically robust and resilient to minimise damage from failures or attacks. AI systems must also be designed to be transparent, ensuring their outputs are understandable and explainable to the people they affect. Systems that interact with humans must be clearly identified as artificial agents, and AI that generates synthetic content, including audio or video, must have outputs that are identifiable as artificially created. The Bill also provides that the use of an AI system will be considered high risk when it presents a significant risk of affecting fundamental rights. High-risk AI systems require a continuous, iterative risk management process throughout their entire lifecycle. The design of high-risk systems must incorporate strong data governance, security standards, and detailed technical documentation. It also provides that high-risk AI must include built-in logging functions to record operational and security events for auditing. It also provides that the design of all AI systems is explicitly prohibited from enabling specific harmful uses, including subliminal manipulation or real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces.

  2. 15/09/2025
    investigation

    National Economic Prosecutor’s Office closed investigation into Meta Platforms and WhatsApp over potential anticompetitive conduct linked to privacy update

    On 15 September 2025, the National Economic Prosecutor’s Office (FNE) in Santiago, Chile, issued Resolution No. 249, ordering the closure of Investigation Roll No. 2660-21 concerning Facebook, Inc., now Meta Platforms, Inc., and WhatsApp LLC, following a complaint lodged on 4 May 2021 regarding potential anticompetitive conduct linked to the May 2021 update of WhatsApp’s Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. The investigation examined whether the update, which introduced new optional business functionalities and integration with Meta services, constituted an abuse of dominant position in the national markets for over-the-top instant messaging services between individuals and for business-to-person communications. Evidence showed WhatsApp held a dominant position in the individual messaging market, with 86 per cent penetration among users aged 18 to 65, but the update did not increase data extraction due to the Signal encryption protocol. In the business-to-person segment, WhatsApp’s products had low penetration and faced significant substitutes, limiting potential dominance. The FNE concluded that the update lacked the objective capacity to generate risks or effects contrary to free competition in the analysed markets, while reserving the authority to reopen proceedings if new circumstances arise.

  3. 11/02/2025
    adoption

    Paris Charter on Artificial Intelligence in the public interest was adopted

    On 11 February 2025, Chile, Finland, France, Germany, India, Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria, Slovenia, and Switzerland adopted the Paris Charter on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the public interest. The charter aims to ensure AI development serves the public interest, focusing on equity, transparency, accountability, and sustainability. It encourages openness in AI and accountability through existing frameworks. The charter calls for safeguards against AI’s potential harms, alongside an affirmative vision to maximise its public benefits, including through open public goods, democratic participation, and sustainable solutions. It also stresses the importance of accessible high-quality data, privacy protection, and smaller, more localised AI models that have a reduced environmental impact.

Last updated: 13/10/2025